ANALISA CEMARAN LOGAM MERKURI PADA IKAN AIR TAWAR DAN UDANG AIR TAWAR SECARA SPEKTROFOTOMETRI SERAPAN ATOM (SSA)

Authors

  • Zuhairiah Zuhairiah Program Studi D3 ANAFARMA, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
  • Erly Sitompul Program Studi S1 Farmasi, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
  • Elly Sitorus Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan
  • Yosy Cinthya Eriwaty Silalahi Program Studi D3 ANAFARMA, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia

Abstract

Fish containing mercury will have a bad impact on the health of the human body. The maximum limit of mercury levels in fish that has been determined by SNI (2009) on fish is 0.5 mg/kg. This study aims to determine the presence or absence of mercury (Hg) metal contamination in several types of freshwater fish, namely catfish (Clariasgariepinus), catfish (Pangsiushypophthalmus), tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), pomfret (Colossomamacropomum) and giant prawn (Macrobrachiumrosenbergii), by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Quantitative analysis of mercury used atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Shimadzu AA-6200). Measured at a wavelength of 253.7 nm. The results of this study were white pomfret containing mercury with levels of 0.2043 -+ 0.0079 mg/kg, catfish containing mercury with levels of 0.4116 -+ 0.1105 mg/kg, catfish containing mercury with levels of 0.4088 -+ 0.1076 mg/kg, tilapia fish contains mercury with levels of 0.4034 -+ 0.1443 mg/kg, tilapia fish contains mercury with levels of 0.4191 -+ 0.0750 mg/kg, and giant prawns contain mercury with levels of 0, 3928 -+ 0.0521 mg/kg. The calculation results show that all types of fresh water fish contain mercury <0.5 in accordance with the requirements set by SNI No.7387 (2009) on fish, namely 0.5 mg/kg.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Standar Nasional Indonesia. 2009. Batas maksimum cemaran logam berat dalam pangan. SNI 7387:2009. Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional. Halaman 15-17.
[2] Darmono, 1995,”Logam Dalam Sistem Biologi Makhluk Hidup”, Penerbit-Press, Jakarta.

[3] Darmono. 2001. Lingkungan hidup dan pencemaran hubungannya dengan toksikologi senyawa logam. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. Halaman 148 – 153.
[4] Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. 11 th ed., Singapore: Elsevier., 2012: 219-240.
[5] Kuntz, S. W., Ricco, J. A., Hill, W. G., &Anderko, L. (2010). Communicating methylmercury risks and fish consumption benefits to vulnerable child bearing populations. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 39(1), 118-126. doi: 10.1111/j.1552- 6909.2009.01094.x
[6] Oken, E., Wright, R. O., Kleinman, K. P., Bellinger, D., Amarasiriwardena, C. J., Hu, H., . . . Gillman, M. W. (2005). Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury, and infant cognition in a
U.S. Cohort. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(10), 1376-1380.
[7] Porto, J.I.R., Araujo, C.S.O., dan Feldberg E. 2005. Mutagenic effects of mercury pollution as revealed by micronucleus test on three Amazonian fish species. Environmental Research. 97:287–292.
[8] Harmita. 2004. ‘Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Validasi Metode dan Cara Perhitungannya’, Majalah Ilmu Kefarmasian, Vol. I, No. 3, Desember.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-26